99p theft sparks twenty years of recruitment struggles

99p theft sparks twenty years of recruitment struggles

The reported experiences of a candidate with a criminal record for stealing a 99p book has raised further questions about whether jobseekers should have to disclose their criminal records during the recruitment process.

Writing anonymously in The Guardian, the individual recounts: “Twenty years ago, I made two mistakes. First, I was caught stealing a book worth 99p – then I compounded this by missing an appointment before a magistrate.

To continue reading FREE content

To continue reading
FREE content

For news and offers direct to your inbox and online, pop your details below.


* By registering you agree that you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions and that Executive Grapevine International Ltd and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content and products.

If you find yourself asked to register again, please make sure that your browser cookie is enabled.

We would like to invite you to become part of Recruitment Grapevine and join the most engaged online communities of recruitment professionals in the UK. Thousands of Recruitment Professionals just like you have already registered with Recruitment Grapevine and we would like you to join in - its FREE!

However, an EU regulation coming our way means that to continue hearing from us, you will need to become a registered user. No matter the outcome of BREXIT, this regulation will apply to us while we remain in the UK and perhaps beyond.

Access across the Recruitment Grapevine site will continue to be free of charge once you register. You will also be able to join our other communities for:

  • HR Professionals
  • Business Leaders

Every reader we retain, is very important to us, and we would appreciate you taking the time to Register with us now.

  • Adam
    Wed, 6 Feb 2019 1:18pm GMT
    I think it depends on what the convictions are for and how long ago they were. Both those would have been spent years ago and the theft would typically be dealt with by a caution from a chief inspector. If they are for small petty offences and the candidate hasn't re-offended in the last 3 years or so then I would be against disclosure.

    However if they within the last 3 years, were serious enough to warrant imprisonment, a suspended sentence or were for sexual or violent crimes then I would expect disclosure to continue and relevant risk assessments taken to decide whether a hire should take place.

Related Articles

Most Read