Why 'name discrimination' could be costing your candidates jobs

Why 'name discrimination' could be costing your candidates jobs

British employers are regularly discriminating against candidates from ethnic minority backgrounds – with the applicants’ names often being the cause for recruiters to dismiss them.

Researchers at Nuffield College's Centre for Social Investigation (CSI) applied to nearly 3200 jobs, randomly varying the minority background of fictitious job applicants while holding their skills, qualifications and work experience constant. All of the fake candidates were British citizens, or had moved to the UK by the age of six.

To continue reading FREE content

To continue reading
FREE content

For news and offers direct to your inbox and online, pop your details below.


* By registering you agree that you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions and that Executive Grapevine International Ltd and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content and products.

If you find yourself asked to register again, please make sure that your browser cookie is enabled.

We would like to invite you to become part of Recruitment Grapevine and join the most engaged online communities of recruitment professionals in the UK. Thousands of Recruitment Professionals just like you have already registered with Recruitment Grapevine and we would like you to join in - its FREE!

However, an EU regulation coming our way means that to continue hearing from us, you will need to become a registered user. No matter the outcome of BREXIT, this regulation will apply to us while we remain in the UK and perhaps beyond.

Access across the Recruitment Grapevine site will continue to be free of charge once you register. You will also be able to join our other communities for:

  • HR Professionals
  • Business Leaders

Every reader we retain, is very important to us, and we would appreciate you taking the time to Register with us now.

  • My posts never get t
    My posts never get t
    Wed, 20 Mar 2019 5:13pm GMT
    Is the problem 'recruiters' do you think? As you state, or perhaps it goes wider/deeper, or more likely the hiring manager? In my experience (as a recruiter), most recruiters want to ensure they have the best chance possible of making a hire (and making money!) - and as such they will put forward every potentially matching candidate that they can; there's very little that can be done to prevent the biases of the hiring managers from im[pacting the numbers who receive a request for interview, after this stage.

    it's a small point, but I don't feel that the recruiter is the right target here, it's the companies themselves. (yes, some recruiters may also be biased, as we all have the potential to be, however, lets lay the blame more squarely with the actual decision makers no?).

    *hopes your terrible team of editors allows this message tough, but doubts it*

Related Articles

Most Read